<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Cube Draft Podcast!</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.cubedrafting.com/2009/03/17/cube-draft-podcast/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.cubedrafting.com/2009/03/17/cube-draft-podcast/</link>
	<description>Play the funnest Magic: The Gathering draft format ever!</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 06 Sep 2010 17:15:54 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.0.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Zac</title>
		<link>http://www.cubedrafting.com/2009/03/17/cube-draft-podcast/comment-page-1/#comment-32</link>
		<dc:creator>Zac</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 17 Mar 2009 16:38:17 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.cubedrafting.com/2009/03/17/cube-draft-podcast/#comment-32</guid>
		<description>Interesting pod cast.  His cube seems to be very large with lots of less-than-exciting cards.  I much prefer the cube listed on this site, but I certainly understand the benefits of having a larger, more diverse cube like MrSuitcase&#039;s.  

Sometimes the cube on this site can seem small; you often see the same card interactions and plays from week to week.  A larger cube inevitably forces one to include sub-optimal cards (which is normal in a traditional booster draft), but it allows for more unseeable plays, unique game situations, and fun, tense, and longer games.  

I presently run a copy of the Cubedrafting.com cube, card-for-card, but I have deeply considered expanding it to include more of the types of cards touched on by Mr.Suitcase.  (definitely not Liar&#039;s Pendulum though.)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Interesting pod cast.  His cube seems to be very large with lots of less-than-exciting cards.  I much prefer the cube listed on this site, but I certainly understand the benefits of having a larger, more diverse cube like MrSuitcase&#8217;s.  </p>
<p>Sometimes the cube on this site can seem small; you often see the same card interactions and plays from week to week.  A larger cube inevitably forces one to include sub-optimal cards (which is normal in a traditional booster draft), but it allows for more unseeable plays, unique game situations, and fun, tense, and longer games.  </p>
<p>I presently run a copy of the Cubedrafting.com cube, card-for-card, but I have deeply considered expanding it to include more of the types of cards touched on by Mr.Suitcase.  (definitely not Liar&#8217;s Pendulum though.)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
