<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Cube Draft Strategy: Reanimator</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.cubedrafting.com/2009/03/03/cube-draft-strategy-reanimator/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.cubedrafting.com/2009/03/03/cube-draft-strategy-reanimator/</link>
	<description>Play the funnest Magic: The Gathering draft format ever!</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 14 Oct 2011 14:26:14 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: wamyc</title>
		<link>http://www.cubedrafting.com/2009/03/03/cube-draft-strategy-reanimator/comment-page-1/#comment-405</link>
		<dc:creator>wamyc</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 21 Jul 2009 07:43:35 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://cubedrafting.nfshost.com/?p=63#comment-405</guid>
		<description>I have a cube of 320 cards, and in this very tight cube I think I only have one grave-hater, Stonecloaker.  And even that is doing a good amount of double duty by itself.  (I&#039;m not counting cards like Unmake, StP or Kumano.) Then again, reanimator is a little anemic in such a small cube, as Evan correctly pointed out that this archety[e benefits from a lot of players at the table.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I have a cube of 320 cards, and in this very tight cube I think I only have one grave-hater, Stonecloaker.  And even that is doing a good amount of double duty by itself.  (I&#8217;m not counting cards like Unmake, StP or Kumano.) Then again, reanimator is a little anemic in such a small cube, as Evan correctly pointed out that this archety[e benefits from a lot of players at the table.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: eidolon</title>
		<link>http://www.cubedrafting.com/2009/03/03/cube-draft-strategy-reanimator/comment-page-1/#comment-29</link>
		<dc:creator>eidolon</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 14 Mar 2009 10:05:08 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://cubedrafting.nfshost.com/?p=63#comment-29</guid>
		<description>I have a little budget (no card over 5 €/6$) cube for my own. as graveyard hate tends to be either very late picks, or sideboard at best, I completely took it out in exchange for superior spells.
Like you said, there are a lot of potent cards, that work against reanimator (bounce, rfg spells, auras, controlmagic in the mid-/lategame), that are very useful against other archetypes as well.
So my question is: How much &quot;real&quot; antigraveyard cards should approximately be in a cube with 450 cards?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I have a little budget (no card over 5 €/6$) cube for my own. as graveyard hate tends to be either very late picks, or sideboard at best, I completely took it out in exchange for superior spells.<br />
Like you said, there are a lot of potent cards, that work against reanimator (bounce, rfg spells, auras, controlmagic in the mid-/lategame), that are very useful against other archetypes as well.<br />
So my question is: How much &#8220;real&#8221; antigraveyard cards should approximately be in a cube with 450 cards?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

<!-- Performance optimized by W3 Total Cache. Learn more: http://www.w3-edge.com/wordpress-plugins/

Minified using disk
Page Caching using memcached
Database Caching 7/17 queries in 0.004 seconds using memcached

Served from: www.cubedrafting.com @ 2012-02-06 11:11:17 -->
